<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vandana Shiva: The Future of Food-Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cookingupastory.com/vandana-shiva-the-future-of-food-part3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cookingupastory.com/vandana-shiva-the-future-of-food-part3</link>
	<description>An online television show about people, food, and sustainable living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eltear</title>
		<link>http://cookingupastory.com/vandana-shiva-the-future-of-food-part3/comment-page-1#comment-38449</link>
		<dc:creator>Eltear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cookingupastory.com/show/7169/#comment-38449</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I didn&#039;t read the thread the same way.   Plus I always discount claims of being rich, beautiful or a scientist in a dailykos (or any) thread.  

I agree that first tier research would be the best source of dependable information.  However, when science is only able to be conducted with the approval and oversight of a product&#039;s corporate owner, it&#039;s hard to get any real unbiased data .. so we&#039;re left with lots of opinions.  

With the current dearth of real study into long-term environmental and health impacts of genetically modified crops, not being proven unsafe does not make me sleep better at night.

I can&#039;t forget that Rachel Carson was called a crank.  Back then plenty of &quot;scientists&quot; had lots of impressive research that &quot;proved&quot; DDT was a good thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I didn&#8217;t read the thread the same way.   Plus I always discount claims of being rich, beautiful or a scientist in a dailykos (or any) thread.  </p>
<p>I agree that first tier research would be the best source of dependable information.  However, when science is only able to be conducted with the approval and oversight of a product&#8217;s corporate owner, it&#8217;s hard to get any real unbiased data .. so we&#8217;re left with lots of opinions.  </p>
<p>With the current dearth of real study into long-term environmental and health impacts of genetically modified crops, not being proven unsafe does not make me sleep better at night.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t forget that Rachel Carson was called a crank.  Back then plenty of &#8220;scientists&#8221; had lots of impressive research that &#8220;proved&#8221; DDT was a good thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Bell</title>
		<link>http://cookingupastory.com/vandana-shiva-the-future-of-food-part3/comment-page-1#comment-38335</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cookingupastory.com/show/7169/#comment-38335</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion thread on Monsanto, GM seeds, BTcorn, many interesting topics here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/4/16/720696/-Monsanto:More-powerful-than-Germany

if you do delve into the thread, note the rancor in the discussion w/a scientist attempting to present an alternate viewpoint. I firmly believe that all sides of argument must be considered. As in any research, the terms in which you couch your search influence the information that turns up. I personally have found it quite difficult to access scientific papers in on-line journals without paying fees in many cases...this can lead to relying on second tier research which is usually more polemical. Just a thought to keep in the back of your head...I have enough of the contrarian in me that I don&#039;t like to be told what to think by any large group...mob think occurs in organizations whose tenets and practices we admire as well  as those we do not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion thread on Monsanto, GM seeds, BTcorn, many interesting topics here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/4/16/720696/-Monsanto:More-powerful-than-Germany" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/4/16/720696/-Monsanto:More-powerful-than-Germany</a></p>
<p>if you do delve into the thread, note the rancor in the discussion w/a scientist attempting to present an alternate viewpoint. I firmly believe that all sides of argument must be considered. As in any research, the terms in which you couch your search influence the information that turns up. I personally have found it quite difficult to access scientific papers in on-line journals without paying fees in many cases&#8230;this can lead to relying on second tier research which is usually more polemical. Just a thought to keep in the back of your head&#8230;I have enough of the contrarian in me that I don&#8217;t like to be told what to think by any large group&#8230;mob think occurs in organizations whose tenets and practices we admire as well  as those we do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
