Seeds Of Life: Hybrids and the Emergence of Seed Monopolies (video)

Throughout much of agriculture, a remarkable span of 10,000 years, farmers were largely the stewards of the land and the crops that they grew. Seeds collected from one year’s harvest were selected, stored, and used again for successive growing seasons. As Frank Morton, an organic seed breeder explains in this segment of the Seeds Of Life series, the role of the farmer at the center of agriculture began to change with the advent of hybrid seed development beginning with hybrid varieties of corn in the 1930’s.

Hybrid seeds are created out of two separate parent lines, each (parent) line, incapable of producing the desirable plant characteristics themselves. Only the seeds of their offspring, provide the desired mix of traits, measured by characteristics, such as : crop yield; protein content; oil quality; disease resistance, and other characteristics. Most importantly, especially to the commercial seed companies, the plants grown from these seeds do not produce useful seeds for further use. Once grown, the plants themselves are dead ends; no further selection under the farmers control can be made to create better crops for the future. Giving new meaning to the term “free enterprise”, hybrid seeds can only be purchased from the commercial seed companies (those in control of the proprietary parent lines); nature’s inherent generosity, circumvented.

Frank Morton, Willamette Valley Organic Seed Breeder; Wild Garden Seed

As Morton points out, beginning in 1965, a period he refers to as, the end of the golden age of plant breeding, there was a push to bring crops that could be made into hybrids, onto the market. This is what attracted the giant chemical companies into the seed business, hybrid technologies, and later biotechnology innovations, conferred the special ability to prevent farmers from saving and reusing seed, making their investments in seed technologies, and closely related chemical products, almost full-proof investments. Land grant universities that formerly conducted plant breeding research under the public domain, and made seeds available to commercial seed companies for sale to farmers, began to shift toward proprietary research to serve private interests instead*.

This is all part of an unfolding story, since after World War Two, there has been a massive consolidation of seed, chemical, and related industries to promote global trade. By virtue of size, certain economies of scale offered protection against new entrants into the marketplace, along with the ability to control prices both at the buying and selling end of the value chain. This ushered in the modern industrial food system, one of the most concentrated set of industries in existence today, and to which, the current Obama administration Justice Department is examining toward possible antitrust litigation.

Although hybrid seed technology helped shift the control of seed production to the seed companies, the introduction of transgenic seed technologies with the extension of patent protection rights dramatically transferred the control of seeds to these massive corporations, the full implications, have not as yet, been fully realized.

As Claire Hope Cummings writes in her book, Uncertain Peril: Genetic Engineering and the Future of Seeds, whoever controls the supply of seed, controls the world’s food supply. Should such concentrated power be allowed to reside within the private realm, or is food so fundamental a right, only governments representing the public interest be allowed to retain ultimate jurisdiction over such a resource?

See Related:
*The Genetic Engineering of Food and the Failure of Science – Part 2: Academic Capitalism and the Loss of Scientific Integrity (PDF)


  1. William says

    Sounds to me like he is saying the chemical companies are obtaining a monopoly on plant seeds. “Two pounds[a] of wheat for a day’s wages,[b] and six pounds[c] of barley for a day’s wages,[d] and do not damage the oil and the wine!”

    Does that sound familiar? It’s a quote from Revelation 6:6, when people have monopolies they control the price of the goods and products. The future doesn’t look to good to me.

  2. Glen Meegan says

    Nice post with several fascinating ideas! I can’t say that I totally agree with everything you have suggested here, but there are several relevant information you have emphasized that can be very usable on gardening and related topics. Please keep offering more information on this topic and associated topics, as there are many out there like me who are attempting to get to know the ups and downs.

  3. says

    I think the question at the end of this article presents a false choice: We don’t have to choose between big corporations controlling the seed supply or big governments controlling it. We just need to go back to seed saving and exchanging on a local level.

    • says

      Thanks for your feedback. I agree, the answer is not to have “big government” but we do need an effective government that represents the interest of the people. Powerful corporations can circumvent the market by virtue of their size, and political power.

      The only counterbalance that will insure a level playing field— so farmers and eaters can make their own choices— is for government to prevent monopolies from forming, or if they already exist (and I believe they do), move to eliminate their monopolistic control. There may be some very limited reasons to allow the existence of certain monopolies, but in the agriculture sector, I can’t see any public good in allowing them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *