This final installment, Ken Meter expresses optimism for the future of local food economies, but a healthy respect for the challenges that lie ahead. Interestingly, Ken Meter suggests we choose foods that are healthier for us to eat as a guide toward supporting local food economies. By contrast, Michael Pollan argues we are too obsessed as a nation with food being eating largely on the basis of health, ignoring other important reasons for eating, such as pleasure, community, culture, etc.. Are they in disagreement? Oddly, I think, not. Pleasure in Pollan’s terms means food that not only tastes good, but also feels good, after we eat it. Ken Meter speaks in terms of health, but the types of food, their seasonality and localness also correspond more closely with better tasting foods, and pleasurable eating. Of course, community, and culture rest comfortably in both camps. After viewing the Michael Pollan interviews, what’s your take on how the two interviews compare?
alan kapuler anthony boutard bbq recipes biotechnology chickens climate change community cooking videos csa dan imhoff DIY food DIY food Environment farmers farmers market farmers markets farming food farmer earth food politics food preservation food system food waste gardening genetic engineering gmo Growing & Raising Food honeybees hunger local food mark keating michael pollan monsanto newsletter organic poverty sare seafood short stories summer sustainable agriculture sustainable food Sustainable Living urban agriculture usda yamhill county